Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
1.
ESMO Open ; 7(2): 100403, 2022 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1654423

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic has created enormous challenges for the clinical management of patients with hematological malignancies (HMs), raising questions about the optimal care of this patient group. METHODS: This consensus manuscript aims at discussing clinical evidence and providing expert advice on statements related to the management of HMs in the COVID-19 pandemic. For this purpose, an international consortium was established including a steering committee, which prepared six working packages addressing significant clinical questions from the COVID-19 diagnosis, treatment, and mitigation strategies to specific HMs management in the pandemic. During a virtual consensus meeting, including global experts and lead by the European Society for Medical Oncology and the European Hematology Association, statements were discussed and voted upon. When a consensus could not be reached, the panel revised statements to develop consensual clinical guidance. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: The expert panel agreed on 33 statements, reflecting a consensus, which will guide clinical decision making for patients with hematological neoplasms during the COVID-19 pandemic.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Hematologic Neoplasms , COVID-19 Testing , Consensus , Hematologic Neoplasms/epidemiology , Hematologic Neoplasms/therapy , Humans , Pandemics
2.
Clin Exp Metastasis ; 38(3): 257-261, 2021 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1147602

ABSTRACT

Cancer patients represent a vulnerable cohort during the Sars-CoV-2 pandemic. Oncological societies have generated a plethora of recommendations, but precise instructions about routine oncological procedures remain scarce. Here, we report on local COVID-19 protection measures established in an interdisciplinary approach at a tertiary care center during the first wave of the pandemia in Germany. Following these measures, no additional morbidity or mortality during oncological procedures was observed, and no nosocomial infections were registered. However, Validation of our measures is outstanding and regional SARS-CoV-2 prevalence was low. However, specific oncological measures might be important to ensure optimal oncological results, especially for advanced cancer stages during this and future pandemia. In the future, communication about these measures might be crucial to a cancer patient´s assigned network to reduce the danger of excess mortality within the second wave of the COVID-19 pandemic.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/prevention & control , Infection Control/methods , Medical Oncology/methods , Neoplasms/immunology , Pandemics/prevention & control , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/transmission , COVID-19/virology , Germany/epidemiology , Humans , Infection Control/organization & administration , Infection Control/standards , Medical Oncology/organization & administration , Medical Oncology/standards , Neoplasms/complications , Pandemics/statistics & numerical data , Prevalence , SARS-CoV-2/immunology , SARS-CoV-2/pathogenicity , Tertiary Care Centers/organization & administration
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL